As businesses become increasingly reliant on intellectual property (IP) to maintain a competitive edge, the risk of facing IP-related lawsuits has grown. Patent disputes, copyright infringement, and issues surrounding trade secrets are all common legal challenges today. However, one overlooked protection that many companies already possess is “Coverage B” in Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies. While this coverage typically provides defense against claims of defamation, slander, and disparagement, its broader scope can often help mitigate IP losses as well.
In this guide, we’ll explore how CGL policies can provide vital protection in intellectual property disputes, why it’s often overlooked, and how businesses can ensure they’re taking full advantage of this coverage.
Introduction to Commercial General Liability Policies
Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies form the backbone of many companies’ risk management strategies. These policies primarily protect businesses against third-party claims involving bodily injury, property damage, and legal liability. However, an often-underappreciated aspect of CGL policies is their ability to mitigate risks beyond physical damages, such as intellectual property-related legal challenges.
What is Coverage B in CGL Policies?
Within most CGL policies, there are two main sections of coverage:
- Coverage A: Protects against claims related to bodily injury and property damage.
- Coverage B: Provides protection for “personal and advertising injury,” including claims of defamation, libel, slander, and disparagement.
Unlike Coverage A, which requires an “accidental occurrence” to trigger coverage, Coverage B applies to a broader range of offenses, including those arising from intentional acts. This means that certain IP-related lawsuits, particularly those involving alleged defamation or disparagement of another company’s products, can potentially be covered under Coverage B
How Coverage B Can Mitigate IP Losses?
While intellectual property claims like patent infringement may not be directly covered under CGL policies, they can be triggered in instances where the IP dispute involves allegations of defamation or disparagement. If a company faces claims of false statements about a competitor’s product, Coverage B can help cover legal defense costs.
This overlap is crucial, as many IP disputes involve claims of unfair competition or defamation affecting reputations and products.
Key Legal Cases Involving Coverage B and IP Claims
When discussing how Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies’ Coverage B can help mitigate intellectual property (IP) losses, two pivotal cases highlight the nuances of Coverage B’s application in such disputes. These cases show how companies can trigger coverage for IP claims related to defamation, disparagement, and advertising injuries. Let’s explore these cases and how they illustrate the protective scope of Coverage B in CGL policies.
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Vita Craft Corp.
In Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Vita Craft Corp., the central issue revolved around whether Hartford had a duty to defend Vita Craft under its Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy. Vita Craft was facing a lawsuit filed by Thermal Solutions, Inc. (TSI), which included multiple claims related to patent infringement, breach of contract, and disparagement.
Case Background
Vita Craft allegedly breached agreements with TSI and unlawfully used TSI’s RFID patented technology. Additionally, the lawsuit included allegations that Vita Craft spread false rumors about one of TSI’s licensees, which led to business harm for TSI.
The case hinged on whether Coverage B of the CGL policy—which provides protection for “personal and advertising injury”—applied to these claims, particularly the accusations of disparagement. Hartford initially denied defense coverage, arguing that the primary claims related to patent infringement and breach of contract, both of which are excluded from coverage.
Coverage B and Disparagement
Vita Craft argued that the disparagement allegations fell within the scope of Coverage B under the CGL policy. Coverage B protects against “oral, written or electronic publication of material that slanders or libels a person or organization or disparages a person’s or organization’s goods, products, or services.” The court agreed with Vita Craft’s argument, determining that even though the main lawsuit focused on patent and contract issues, the disparagement claim was sufficient to trigger the insurer’s duty to defend under Coverage B.
This case is significant because it demonstrates that even in cases where intellectual property claims like patent infringement are excluded, Coverage B can still be invoked if there are secondary claims related to defamation or disparagement. The court found that the allegations of false rumors, which negatively impacted TSI’s business, qualified as disparagement under Coverage B. As a result, Hartford was required to provide a defense for Vita Craft.
Foliar Nutrients, Inc. v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Co.
The case of Foliar Nutrients, Inc. v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Co. presents another example of how Coverage B can be applied to intellectual property-related disputes, particularly those involving disparagement.
Case Background
Foliar Nutrients and Big Bend Agri-Services were sued by their competitor, Plant Food Systems (PFS), for patent infringement and unfair competition. PFS accused Foliar and Big Bend of false advertising and defamation, dissuading customers from buying PFS products. These defamatory statements, according to PFS, falsely suggested that PFS’s products were subject to litigation, which harmed their business and reputation.
Foliar Nutrients and Big Bend sought defense coverage from Nationwide Agribusiness under their CGL policy after filing the lawsuit. Nationwide denied coverage, arguing that the claims related to patent infringement were excluded from the policy, and therefore, they were not obligated to defend.
Disparagement as a Trigger for Coverage
Despite Nationwide’s initial denial, Foliar argued that the disparagement claims made by PFS were covered under Coverage B, which protects against “personal and advertising injury,” including slander and disparagement. Foliar claimed that the false statements made about PFS’s products amounted to disparagement, thereby triggering the insurer’s duty to defend under the policy.
The court ruled in favor of Foliar, stating the defamatory statements about PFS’s products were covered under Coverage B. The defamation claims were enough to trigger coverage, despite the primary claims being about patent infringement. As a result, Nationwide was required to defend Foliar and Big Bend in the lawsuit.
This case underscores an important principle: even when a lawsuit primarily involves excluded IP claims, like patent infringement, it can still apply if the suit includes claims of defamation, disparagement, or related advertising injuries. The case highlights the potential for coverage in IP disputes, especially when the allegations extend beyond mere IP infringement and involve harm to reputation or business standing through false statements.
Lessons from These Cases
Both the Vita Craft and Foliar Nutrients cases illustrate how businesses facing intellectual property disputes can leverage Coverage B to secure a defense, even in situations where the primary claims are excluded under the policy’s intellectual property exclusions. In both cases:
Disparagement and Defamation
Central to triggering coverage under Coverage B, even though the lawsuits involved excluded IP claims like patent infringement.
Insurers initially denied coverage
Arguing that the lawsuits were outside the scope of the policy due to the intellectual property exclusions. However, courts found that the disparagement claims fell within the realm of advertising injury, obligating the insurers to defend the lawsuits.
Coverage B’s scope is broader than many businesses realize
Covering advertising injuries that may arise in the context of intellectual property disputes. This coverage defends businesses accused of making false statements about competitors’ products or services. It acts as a vital protection mechanism.
Policyholders need to carefully review complaints
For any mention of advertising injuries, defamation, or disparagement, even if the main claim is related to intellectual property. Identifying these elements early can help businesses secure a defense under Coverage B.
The cases of Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Vita Craft Corp. and Foliar Nutrients, Inc. v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Co. are prime examples of how Coverage B in CGL policies can provide crucial protection in intellectual property-related lawsuits. Understanding Coverage B helps businesses reduce financial risks in defending against IP disputes. Insurers had to defend policyholders despite primary claims of intellectual property exclusions, as they included defamation and disparagement allegations.
These cases emphasize the need to review lawsuits thoroughly and challenge coverage denials related to advertising injuries. For businesses engaged in intellectual property-heavy industries, ensuring they are covered under Coverage B could make the difference between facing a costly legal battle alone and having the support of their insurer.
What is Covered Under Coverage B?
Coverage B, often referred to as Personal and Advertising Injury Liability, protects a Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy for claims that go beyond physical injuries or property damage. It typically covers legal liabilities arising from offenses that include:
Defamation (Libel and Slander)
This includes coverage for damages caused by oral or written statements that harm the reputation of an individual or organization. If a company is sued for defaming another business, its products, or services, Coverage B could help defend against the lawsuit.
Disparagement
One of the key aspects of Coverage B is its protection against claims of disparagement. This applies when a business is accused of making false statements about another company, causing financial harm. This injury often arises in IP disputes when one company claims another harms its reputation through disparaging statements.
Infringement of Copyright, Trade Dress, or Slogan in Advertising
Coverage B often extends to claims where a business is accused of infringing another company’s copyright, trade dress, or slogan in its advertisements. While patent and trademark claims are typically excluded (discussed below), advertising-related infringements may still trigger coverage.
Invasion of Privacy
This coverage protects against claims that a business has violated someone’s privacy rights, such as through unauthorized use of an individual’s likeness or personal information in advertising.
Misleading Advertising or Promotion
If a company is sued for false or misleading advertising that causes harm to a competitor or consumer, It can potentially provide defense coverage.
In both the Vita Craft and Foliar Nutrients cases, the courts determined that disparagement allegations—such as making false statements about competitors—were sufficient to trigger Coverage B, requiring the insurer to defend the policyholders even though the lawsuits also involved IP-related claims.
What Coverage B Won’t Cover?
While Coverage B offers important protections, it does come with significant exclusions, particularly in the realm of intellectual property disputes. Here’s what is generally excluded under Coverage B:
Patent Infringement
One of the most notable exclusions in most CGL policies is protection for patent infringement claims. Courts consistently rule that patent disputes aren’t covered by Coverage B, as they involve unauthorized use, not personal injury.
Trademark Infringement
Coverage B typically excludes claims related to trademark or trade name infringement. This is because trademarks are considered intellectual property rights that fall under a different legal category, distinct from advertising injuries. There may be exceptions if trademark infringement is part of a broader advertising injury claim, like false advertising.
Breach of Contract
Claims that arise out of a breach of contract, including those related to IP licensing agreements, are generally not covered under Coverage B. For example, in Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Vita Craft Corp., patent infringement and breach of contract were central to the case, but only the disparagement allegations triggered Coverage B coverage.
Intentional Acts Exclusion
While Coverage B covers defamation and disparagement, it does not protect against deliberate, intentional wrongdoing that causes harm. If the act is deemed intentional and malicious, insurers can deny coverage, even if the act technically fits within the definition of advertising injury.
Claims Solely Related to IP Infringement
It will generally not apply to pure IP infringement claims (e.g., copyright or trademark violations) unless those claims also involve a related advertising injury. For instance, in the Foliar nutrient case, the primary patent infringement claim was excluded, but the accompanying disparagement allegations triggered the insurer’s duty to defend.
Common Misconceptions About Coverage B and IP Lawsuits
| Misconception | Reality |
Coverage B only applies to bodily injury and property damage | Coverage B primarily covers personal and advertising injuries, including claims of defamation, slander, and disparagement. It’s distinct from Coverage A, which addresses bodily injury and property damage. |
Coverage B does not apply to IP-related disputes | While direct IP infringement claims (like patent or trademark disputes) are generally excluded, disparagement or defamation claims related to IP disputes can trigger Coverage B’s duty to defend. |
Disparagement claims must be explicitly stated | Even if a lawsuit doesn’t explicitly mention disparagement or defamation, courts have found that related allegations (e.g., false statements harming a competitor’s reputation) can still fall under Coverage B. |
Exclusions for IP infringement bar all related coverage | IP exclusions may apply to specific claims like patent or trademark infringement, but if the lawsuit also involves defamation or disparagement, Coverage B can still be triggered for those claims. |
Insurers always need evidence of intent to cover defamation | Coverage B can apply even to unintentional acts of defamation or disparagement in advertising, provided they fit the policy’s definition of advertising injury. Intent is not always necessary to trigger a defense. |
If the lawsuit focuses on a breach of contract, Coverage B won’t apply | Coverage B won’t cover breach of contract claims, but if the complaint includes defamation, disparagement, or false advertising, these claims can trigger a defense under Coverage B, even within a contract dispute. |
It requires the same occurrence-based trigger as Coverage A | Coverage B is not based on an accidental occurrence like Coverage A. Instead, it can be triggered by intentional acts such as statements made in advertising that harm another company’s reputation. |
This table summarizes the common misunderstandings and the realities of how Coverage B can work in the context of IP disputes, helping businesses better understand how they can leverage their policies.
How to Leverage Coverage B in IP-Related Disputes?
Securing the benefits of Coverage B in intellectual property-related disputes requires a proactive and strategic approach. Businesses can use Coverage B for defense in lawsuits involving defamation or disparagement alongside other IP claims. Here’s how to do that effectively:
Closely Examine the Complaint for Disparagement or Defamation Allegations
Even if the primary claims in an IP lawsuit involve patent or trademark infringement, it’s crucial to review the complaint for any mention of disparagement, defamation, or other forms of advertising injury. These claims can trigger the insurer’s duty to defend, even if they are only a small part of the overall lawsuit. For example, in the Vita Craft and Foliar Nutrients cases, the courts focused on the allegations of false statements and disparagement to find coverage.
Push Back on Coverage Denials
Insurers may deny coverage citing IP exclusions, but businesses should challenge by highlighting advertising injury claims. For instance, even if a lawsuit is framed around patent infringement, if there are allegations of false statements about a competitor’s product, this could potentially trigger Coverage B.
Provide Additional Information During the Claims Process
If the complaint lacks clear defamation or disparagement, businesses can provide facts to clarify their relevance to the case. In the Vita Craft case, additional evidence provided during the discovery process helped clarify the disparagement claims, which ultimately secured the insurer’s duty to defend.
Use Legal Precedents to Support Coverage
Referencing key legal precedents, such as Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Vita Craft Corp. and Foliar Nutrients, Inc. v. Nationwide, can strengthen your argument when negotiating with insurers. These cases show how courts have ruled in favor of triggering Coverage B based on defamation or disparagement claims within larger IP disputes.
Document All Communications with Insurers
It’s essential to keep detailed records of communications with your insurer, including defense coverage requests and responses. If the insurer denies coverage, having a paper trail can support your case if the issue escalates to litigation.
By understanding the full scope of Coverage B, businesses can protect themselves against the high costs associated with defending intellectual property lawsuits, particularly when they involve claims of disparagement or advertising injuries. Being strategic and assertive can ensure that companies receive the full benefits of the coverage they’ve purchased.
FAQs
What does Coverage B protect against?
Coverage B primarily covers personal and advertising injury, including claims of defamation, slander, and disparagement.
Can Coverage B help in patent or trademark lawsuits?
Coverage B usually excludes direct IP infringement but may provide defense for related defamation or disparagement claims.
What are the common exclusions under Coverage B?
Most policies exclude direct patent, trademark, and copyright claims, but may cover related disparagement claims.
How can I ensure my CGL policy covers IP disputes?
Review the policy language carefully, consult with legal experts, and consider negotiating broader terms at policy renewal.
What should I do if my insurer denies Coverage B in an IP lawsuit?
Challenge the denial by highlighting any claims related to defamation or disparagement and seek legal counsel to push back effectively.
Conclusion
Coverage B in Commercial General Liability policies can be a valuable asset for businesses facing intellectual property disputes. By understanding the scope of this coverage and proactively managing potential claims, companies can reduce their legal exposure and secure the defense they deserve. As courts recognize Coverage B in IP lawsuits, businesses should review policies to ensure full use of this protection.
At Stevens Law Group, we understand the intricate landscape of intellectual property law and the critical role that effective legal representation plays in safeguarding your innovations. Our skilled patent attorneys and agents possess the technical expertise to navigate complex U.S. and international patent procedures.
As businesses face an increasing number of IP-related challenges, understanding the nuances of your insurance coverage—particularly the often-overlooked Coverage B in Commercial General Liability policies—can make a significant difference in mitigating potential losses.
We recommend reviewing your policies and seeking legal guidance to maximize protections against IP disputes.
Don’t leave your intellectual property unprotected. Contact Stevens Law Group today to schedule a consultation. Let our passionate and knowledgeable team help you navigate your IP needs and ensure that your innovations remain secure in an ever-evolving marketplace.
References:
– Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Vita Craft Corp.
– IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Leave a Reply